Every time history repeats itself, the price goes up. -- 
    Unknown
  History is perceived differently from country to country and 
    from generation to generation. History is not static and diachronic. In my 
    book Divided Lives, many of the women that I interviewed claim to discuss 
    German history as the Germans perceive it and tell it.
  The stories of the Mischling women in Divided Lives -- Hecht, 
    Wecker, Yost, Wilmschen, Lorenzen, Randt, Ilse B., Wetzel, and Bosselmann 
    -- display vividly the trauma these women endured during and after the Third 
    Reich, and the coping mechanisms they sought after or adopted. Wilmschen's, 
    Wetzel's, Bierstedt's, and Bosselmann's mothers were deported to camps. Yost's 
    and Randt's fathers escaped Germany, Gretel Lorenzen's father was deported 
    to a camp, Wecker's father was killed by the Nazis, and Hecht's was purportedly 
    exterminated in Auschwitz. 
  Many of the women experienced trauma symptoms that did not necessarily 
    dissipate once they had "purged" their memories. As Laub says -- 
    The traumatic event, although real, took place outside the parameters of "normal" 
    reality, such as causality, sequence, place and time. The trauma is thus an 
    event that has no beginning, no ending, no before, no during and no after. 
    This absence of categories that define it lends it a quality of "otherness," 
    a salience, a timelessness and a ubiquity that puts it outside the range of 
    associatively linked experiences, outside the range of comprehension, of recounting 
    and of mastery. Trauma survivors live not with memories of the past, but with 
    an event that could not and did not proceed through to its completion, has 
    no ending, attained no closure, and therefore, as far as its survivors are 
    concerned, continues into the present and is current in every respect.
 Hence, the women repeatedly commented, "I can't describe this," 
  and "you can't imagine" as they attempted to narrate their past lives 
  in the present. They could not escape the fact that they were victims at one 
  time, that the people with whom they lived had been their persecutors. This 
  problem is seen also in the United States, such as with African Americans and 
  Native Americans. It would seem a difficult thing for anyone to live peacefully 
  among her tormenters. This problem exists in many other nations. South Africa, 
  Argentina, and other states have collapsed and been renewed under somewhat less 
  authoritarian conditions. There is a lot of bitterness and inability to forget. 
  We must look at the Mid-East, the Balkans, Rwanda/Botswana and other regions 
  where these hatreds continue for generations and generations. Perhaps it is 
  just part of the human condition -- not really a disease that can be "healed," 
  or a trauma that can be "purged." 
The issues that the Mischling women faced can be bridged to the present in 
  America. In a country verging sometimes on amorality, very often pushed by the 
  media, we grasp at techniques such as dehumanization, stereotypes, and violence 
  to talk about or act against "enemies." Do the same fears still predominate 
  in human nature, those of needing to exterminate for racial cleansing, and the 
  fear of the unknown?
History is difficult to escape. These Mischling women have little, if any, 
  support in Germany today. Silence is preferable to talking to the "wrong" 
  person about their background. Perhaps this is why they still struggle to one 
  degree or another with their identities. Most Mischlinge who survived do not 
  have support within the Jüdische Gemeinde (Jewish community). The "mixed" 
  women are still "mixed" psychologically and socially. They rarely 
  and cautiously reveal their heritage or their former outcast status so as not 
  to draw attention to themselves. Often they have not disclosed their past to 
  children or grandchildren. For the most part, they want to be included in German 
  society and not be seen as women who were once considered "inferior" 
  or "outsiders" by the majority. 
Even though now they can speak about their past, they protect their current 
  status. Few of the women had ever spoken, and had not disclosed their identity 
  split between Jew and Christian. To the outside world, they were Germans. What 
  these women discuss can be viewed as a warning to other cultures. We see what 
  transpires from racist fanaticism and fascism. Through these women's narratives 
  we not only can better understand women's plight under authorized persecution, 
  but also the personal, individual traumas they withstood in regard to self, 
  parents, lovers, husbands, children, and career. 
During the era of National Socialism, women more than men tended to be attached 
  to community life, and they were more aware of their disintegrating world. Women 
  also were expected to remain at home to care for parents and siblings, whereas 
  men were more mobile and able (by virtue of their gender) to hide or emigrate. 
  Because these women lived in constant turmoil, with relationships shifting so 
  dramatically, they had to escape from their lives, essentially, from their selves, 
  in some manner -- physically, psychologically, or both. Many academics, including 
  Raul Hilberg, argued that discrimination against the Mischlinge was not severe. 
  However, the narratives that make up my book dispute such historical suppositions. 
  As Büttner claims, "Reports of those involved give another picture 
  of the persecution of that time. That is why a new look at this subject is necessary."